New Delhi: The decision of the country's largest court has come on the country's longest trial, that is, the Ayodhya dispute. The Supreme Court, while giving the verdict, said that the disputed land belonged to Ramlala. The court rejected the Nirmohi arena in this case. The court said that the High Court's decision to divide the land among the three parties was not logical.
At the same time, the court has decided that five acres of alternative land be given to the Sunni Waqf Board. However, he is not happy with this decision of the Supreme Court. The Muslim side's lawyer Zafaryab Jilani has expressed displeasure over the Supreme Court's decision.
Zafaryab Jilani said, "The Sunni Waqf Board will challenge the Supreme Court verdict." I do not agree with the verdict. ''
Explain that the Supreme Court said in its decision that the central government should decide by making trust in three months. Rules for management of trust, rules for temple construction. The inside and outside of the disputed land should be given to the trust. "The Muslim side should get 5 acres of alternative land either from the center acquired in 1993 or the state government should give it somewhere in Ayodhya.